Talk:Scopa (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Fuzheado in topic Requested move 21 February 2023
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 21 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Scopa. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 21 February 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus against move, given WP:PRIMARTYTOPIC. Fuzheado | Talk 07:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The Scopa game is not more rilevant than Scopa (biology). And there are also other meanings. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. The game is the clear primary topic according to page views, and the biological term is relatively rare ("sets of hairs found on the body of those bees that do not use pollen baskets or sublingual pouches to transport pollen"). Dekimasuよ! 07:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose.ProofCreature (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, page views show a prominent topic. ɱ (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at pageviews, I can see that Scopa got more visits than other pages, anyway 1) small amount for all the pages 2) pageviews, in my opionion, it's one factor to considered. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. The game is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.