 | This page was proposed for deletion by Damien Linnane (talk · contribs) on 26 April 2013 with the comment: not notable enough - only third party source is one passing mention from the Guardian in 2003 It was contested by Schwede66 (talk · contribs) on 29 April 2013 with the comment: rm prod; expand; tweaks |
| This page was proposed for deletion by PonyToast (talk · contribs) on 15 January 2020 with the comment: Fails notability, most sources are self-references, no updates other than templates & categories for over two years so it is not actively being improved. It was contested by Gadfium (talk · contribs) on 07:46, 15 January 2020 with the comment: Rm prod, site has regularly renewed content, AFD would be more appropriate. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Notability edit
I belive that; this article meets notability requiments, tag should be removed IMO Brian | (Talk) 05:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Scoop has accredited journalists to the New Zealand Parliament press galley (press corps for Americans). Scoop is one of the most popular news services in New Zealand and has recieved coverage in several 'mainstream' media[1]. It recieves wires from around the world. It's an interesting website that you should go look at! --Midnighttonight 23:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- It has a fairly low Alexa rank though - 153 in NZ and 31,792 in the world. Are there any third party works specifically about the site, rather than just passing mentions? Richard001 (talk) 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)