Talk:Scientific controversy
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability edit
Why would this page redirect to Scientific method? Do people think that science has not had its share of controversies in modern times? I could draw up a lengthy list of scientific controversies, just from the last 400 years (since Galileo). --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Call to arms edit
It would be nice to have an article rather than just a list of quotes. Vsmith (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Article Evaluation edit
Everything in the article is related to the topic except the last section, "Government involvement".Not sure what's the relationship with the topic.
One citation link with "Nation Center for Science Education"cannot be found. Most of them are neutral resources, from university, scientific magazine, dictionary. The last one cited from UKessays might be biased because it is a writing website with unknown author.
The article is part of the WikiProject Science and has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale and as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Davidyang94 (talk) 00:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Article Content edit
Proposal to add a section for Covid-19 origin controversy.
Examples of scientific controversies edit
The very last sentence says, "Listed below, there are some of the various examples of scientific controversies.
" But there's none. This has to be rectified. — Python Drink (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Content doesn't reflect lead edit
This article's content does not reflect the given definition for "scientific controversy", which (according to given and sourced definition) is a neutral term describing scholarly disagreement--with that disagreement not having to arise from bias. JackTheSecond (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)