 | Schweiz am Sonntag received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schweiz am Sonntag article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hard to believe
editA depressing article: so now Swiss politicians can cavort themselves as shockingly as they like, and the Swiss press won't dare to expose them. Good for the politicians, not for the Swiss. Moonraker (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Neutrality tag
editI have tagged the page for neutrality. As discussed in the DYK nomination, the article is half facts about the paper and half controversy about a politician who is not even notable enough to have his own Wikipedia page. It doesn't seem balanced or neutral. Yoninah (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)