This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If, as the article suggests, these "diplomats" (against which the author seems to be rather biased) did nothing else but advocating attacking each other, why then are they called "diplomats", a diplomat - first and formost, I would say - trying to solve conflicts by way of talks...? Or were these only talks to prepare war? --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
