Talk:Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
Latest comment: 6 years ago by TheGreatConsultingDetective in topic Just because it's published by the APA doesn't make it notable
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Just because it's published by the APA doesn't make it notable edit
Contrary to DGG's recent statement in his edit summary deprodding this page, WP:JWG says that "a journal published by a notable organization does not necessarily mean that the journal is itself notable." Sure, this is just an essay, but it still seems to be a good reason that this journal isn't necessarily notable just because the APA publishes it. Every morning (there's a halo...) 00:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- APA lists a little over 90 journals on their 2018 Journals Catalog[1], 86 of which are represented on Wikipedia and listed on the site's American Psychological Association academic journals category page. Should we complete the list or limit it to the notable ones as you say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGreatConsultingDetective (talk • contribs) 09:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)