Talk:Schnappi, das kleine Krokodil
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Schnappidaskleinekrokodil.jpg
editImage:Schnappidaskleinekrokodil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Potential misunderstanding
editThe song was a huge success in several continental European countries, topping the singles charts in Belgium, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland for several weeks. Even more oddly, the song was a top ten hit in non-German speaking countries such as Australia and New Zealand.
This could lead to a misunderstanding that countries such as Sweden, Netherlands and Norway were German-speaking countries. Badly worded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.243.208.195 (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Schnappi, das kleine Krokodil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hbo7TA5o?url=http://www.charts-surfer.de/musiksearch.php to http://www.charts-surfer.de/musiksearch.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404175659/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2005 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2005
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100120235308/http://www.mtv.de/charts/Single_Jahrescharts_2005 to http://www.mtv.de/charts/Single_Jahrescharts_2005
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5r7HjO3zL?url=http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Why?
editWhy are you removing my edits and refusing the links to the countries? -And threatening to block me?- Don't you want it to be a good Wikipedia-page? 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- If you would just take a moment of your time to read MOS:OVERLINK, we wouldn't have this problem. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- It's not even close being overlinked, as there is no links to the countries i linked at all. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- But Flanders, thats not even a country, you can accept? But not countries like Germany? OK... 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I suspect you didn't even click the link, so allow me to clarify: well-know countries do not need to be linked. Regions not well-known, such as Flanders (D'oh! I meant to say Flanders), should be linked. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also well-known countries NEED to be linked for Wikipedia to accept it as a good article. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Check out a few good music articles and get back to me on that. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also well-known countries NEED to be linked for Wikipedia to accept it as a good article. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- It's not even close being overlinked, as there is no links to the countries i linked at all. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)