Talk:Schism of the Three Chapters

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lombards#Historic Kings of the Lombards|King]] The anchor (#Historic Kings of the Lombards) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Confusing wording edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The condemnation took place as an Imperial Edict around 543, this was accompanied by a Tome from Pope Leo I.

I don’t understand what does it say about The Tome (probably with the finite article)? Was it condemned as well, or was it a foundation or proof on which the condemnation was based? Ceplm (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic