This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Modernizing Article
editThis article is a stub that's pretty out of date. I'd like to expand it and update it with new info. Also one source (reference 5) is inaccessable to me and I'd like to read it. If anyone can show me it or talk to me about it so I don't have to buy it, that would be great. Snowyderbyday (talk) 09:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
References
editRemoving inline references and replacing them with {{r}} seems unnecessarily complicated. Every ref needs a unique name and has to be transcluded and the article also loses readability during editing. I appreciate the work that went into changing this, but don't see any clear reason for it. // sikander { talk } 02:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah I just rewrote the article and wasn't a fan of this style.Citing (talk) 21:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Since the {{r}} ref format was put in place, other inline citations have been added. Per WP:CITEVAR a consistent style should be used throughout the article. Noting the comments above, I am willing to make the article changes to move to all inline citation style. Agree? (Skoot13 (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC))
- I have moved to inline citations and added a ref clean-up. (Skoot13 (talk) 21:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC))
Incorrect information in preview
editWhen searched on Bing, a preview of this wiki shows up and the first sentence describes Koul as a "racist". This addition has been removed from the official page itself as it was clearly added by a troll, but still shows up when searched. 77.98.155.56 (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, yikes. It seems to have cached an old vandalized version that was up for a few hours. I'm not sure we can do anything since this is an issue on Bing's end. A WP:REVDEL may help, but I don't know. Citing (talk) 16:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)