Talk:Sayid Abdulloh Nuri

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Central Asia Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Asia portal Sayid Abdulloh Nuri is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Declassified documents

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The claim about the alliance between Iran and Taliban is nonsense. At that time, Iran was supporting the northern alliance (which was in war with Taliban). Later, when Taliban captured Mazar Sharif, they killed Iranian diplomats. You can not present every nonsense claim in NY Times as undisputable fact. Jahāngard 00:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a source for it, so it should probably be included, but I think that attributing the opinion to The New York Times would be a good idea. What do you think? - Francis Tyers · 15:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be included. I'm saying that it shouldn't be presented as undisputable fact. Jahāngard 15:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic