Talk:Say So
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Your Power in topic Song copies Skylar Spence's "Fiona Coyne"
![]() | Say So has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 18, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Say So article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Say So. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Say So at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | On 10 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Say So (Doja Cat song) to Say So. The result of the discussion was moved. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Song copies Skylar Spence's "Fiona Coyne"
editI'm surprised that there is no discussion either on the main page of this entry or on this talk page about the accusation that "Say So" copies Skylar Spence's "Fiona Coyne." See here. I'm not going to immediately add it to the front page since I wanted to see if there has been some discussion that I missed. Bc.rox.all (talk) 23:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Bc.rox.all: one question editors ask themselves to determine whether a detail like this can be included in the article is if it constitutes due weight. Does a significant amount of reliable sources about the topic talk about the backlash you describe? For example, the Dr. Luke controversy in this very Say So article has its own subsection because so many music critics talked about his involvement. In this case, the only sources I could find that make this comparison are the Popbuzz article you linked as well as two Stereogum articles (1) (2).
- The thing is, Popbuzz's reliability is dubious, so I doubt that the detail will remain in the article if you use that as your sole source. Another thing - while I would say the Stereogum articles are marginally more reliable, you have only one source that backs up that claim of " it was accused of copying the melody of the song". You can put that information in the "Critical reception" section, but make sure to attribute the writer who made the claim to keep a neutral point of view, and make sure to get across that only that writer shares the opinion. Your Power 🐍 💬 "What did I tell you?"
📝 "Don't get complacent..." 09:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)