Talk:Saxon (vehicle)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Saxon Command Posts were also developed for Territorial Air Defence Units.
Bob
I read in the Telegraph today that Saxon is being scrapped on acount of not being much use for anything
R
I'm not confident enough in my knowledge to edit, but I'm fairly sure these are Bedford TM 4-4 rather than M-type based (500 diesel, different running gear etc.)
Fair use rationale for Image:Saxonb.jpg edit
Image:Saxonb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it really correct to have Lord Dannet's quotes on this page, given he's a proven biased source who throws dirt at the Saxon to try and hide over his own endorsed project that proved more useless than the Saxon ever was, the Pinzgauer Vector? The Saxon's had proven resistance in warzones already. Shouldn't this line be removed, given it casts a very biased source across the article and the factuality of it as a result? TheFuzzyOne (talk) 23:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)