Talk:Saxo Bank/Archives/2017
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Hobbes Goodyear in topic Financemagnates removal
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Financemagnates removal
Hobbes Goodyear, may I know why you consider financemagnates.com and unreliable source? The article seems to be quite dependent on that source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enivid (talk • contribs)
- There is plenty of coverage of Saxo on financemagnates.com and its predecessor forexmagnates.com, and it is...rather favorable to the bank:
- This seems more like a press release than a product review.
- More of same: Saxo Bank Embarks on Revolutionizing Bond Trading in a Digital Environment
- Taking sides here with the bank against a regulator and bank's unknown enemies: "Whoever is after Saxo they are pretty successful at getting deep into their pockets." "Seen from the outside it does seem like the Danish FSA continues to bungle up but it should be said that Saxo Bank remains the only true global investment bank in Denmark."
- They don't ignore bad news about Saxo, but they do minimize it--Saxo will reimburse just one trader up to £150K.
- I don't know if the bank is an actual client of the website, or whether the site is just an over-enthusiastic regurgitator of the bank's PR/marketing, but I do not consider it a reliable source. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)