Talk:Saving Private Ryan/GA2

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Jclemens in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I tagged a couple of things that were missing cites, but I have no doubt as to their accuracy or that they can be cited in due course.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    Archiving the talk page so severely may have been appropriate, but I had to go through the article history to reassure myself that you weren't trying to hide anything.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    There's certainly room for screenshots from the movie.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply