Talk:Saurabh Bagchi

Notability

MrOllie says: "You can't simulteanously claim that he's notable for programs at the IEE and that IEEE sources are independent." IEEE is the largest computing organization, a non-profit, and a neutral, widely respected organization. So I think references to IEEE articles are independent evidence of notability. Plus there are articles from several news media sources.

Sonata19 (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Sonata19, No. We need sources that are truly independent. This article will likely be deleted entirely without proper sourcing. MrOllie (talk) 01:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I find the following sources to be independent: edX, Indianapolis TV station, Amazon science, NSF news story, Inside Indiana Business, ...

Techphile (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

.To be clear, sources must both be independent and provide substantial biographical content about Bagchi. Stuff about his business or items that simply quote him do not satisfy notability requirements. MrOllie (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC) a

Notability (academics)

Dr. Saurabh Bagchi meets the following conditions from WP:NACADEMIC:

1. His research has a significant impact on the "dependable computing" area. He has the 2nd highest citation in this area according to Google Scholar (8864 as of 06-25-2021).
2. His contributions to the computing field have been acknowledged by widely respected organizations like IEEE and ACM.
3. He has received important awards, such as the Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award.
4. He has lead major programs in the computing field in leading professional organizations like IEEE.

Zarghaft (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

There are several independent sources as pointed out in my above talk page post. More independent sources have been added since my post. So I am removing the warning about independent sources.

Sonata19 (talk) 01:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

References