Talk:Satan's Circus

Latest comment: 7 years ago by YorkshireNed in topic Chronology link

Fair use rationale for Image:Satan's Circus.jpg edit

 

Image:Satan's Circus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chronology link edit

Personally I think the link in the infobox on the right that takes you to the FabricLive23 compilation album should be changed to Trans-Love Energies as this was their follow up to Satan's Circus. While FL23 may have been released before TLE, it's not considered a Death In Vegas studio album, and therefore IMPO not part of their discography. Other editors thoughts on this? Robvanvee 17:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bit of a grey area...it IS part of their discography but it's not an album of their original music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YorkshireNed (talkcontribs) 17:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Subjective line removed edit

I removed the line about the bonus disc "After the release of Satan's Circus, the disappointment felt by many fans was appeased by this mix of songs taken from all three previous albums" as it seems very subjective and completely un-quantified. We have a Metacritic rating of 63% based on 13 reviews. All bar 1 of the 13 reviews was positive and user on discogs have rated it 4.1/5[1] while Rate Your Music users currently have it at 3.2/5 [2]

References