Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 16

Route Description

The route description was entered chronologically by date of improvements and settlement establishment. SriMesh | talk 01:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Murders?

Has anyone got any info on all the unsolved murders that have alledgedly taken place on this route? Morbid fascination prompts me to enquire! 19:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.217.24 (talk)

Good article review

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article is in need of two changes. The first is a massive replacement of red links. There are way too many to pass at this time. The second thing is the USRD/Canada Roads WikiProject compliant junction list is not used here, and this chart is too dang large. An example of it would be Saskatchewan Highway 913, where it is used correctly. I've put this article on hold. This is easy, just fix those two problems. ^Mitch32^contribs 16:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I am puttering away at creating community and rural municipality articles to reduce red links. The USRD/Canada Roads WikiProject compliant junction list is used, as I did copy it from Saskatchewan Highway 913 so things would become consistent. The only thing I did differently was to stuff in the Template:Km to mi as when the highway was started, Canada was using miles, and then in the 1970's Canada roadways all changed to metric, and now everything is in kilometers. So thought it would be handy to have both miles for the US visitors who still use miles, and kilometers for the CA visitors who now use Kms. Don't know what to do about the silly chart length. I only mentioned major intersections and concurrencies and not all the little intersections with township and range grid roads. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Very sorry for the late reply. However, I'm gonna pass this article, but I do suggest it get a good copyedit and a good peer review.^Mitch32^contribs 18:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

History

This feature article Ridge Route has an history section - from pre history to current status. SriMesh | talk 19:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The article goes into quite a digression about the city of Lloydminster. The link to the Lloydminster article should be adequate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demogaffe (talk • contribs) 15:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect image

The image used to represent the cloverleaf interchange at Saskatoon does not accurately represent it, as the interchange has a different configuration than that shown in the generic image. Is there not an aerial image of the actual structure available? 50.66.121.20 (talk) 04:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Saskatchewan Highway 16

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

This 2008 listing contains significant uncited material, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b). It also contains extensive quoting of copyrighted material, which for me goes beyond WP:LIMITED and violates criterion 2d). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.