Talk:Sarah Tisdall

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Phase4 in topic Gigantic sentence

Gigantic sentence

edit

Although initially the case against the paper was deemed to be covered by section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, the judgement was almost immediately overturned on appeal, on the grounds that although the document itself was harmless, a civil servant capable of leaking it might leak others which were not. This really needs to be cleaned up! It doesn't explain what case was brought initially by the Crown, what happened to that case? was there another case? what happened? The sequence is muddled into one gigantic sentence. --Red King 23:33, 1 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Now revamped into bite-sized portions!Phase4 19:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply