Talk:Santa Maria della Purità (Rome)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the church of Santa Maria della Purità in Rome was managed by priests whose main task was holding the tail of the pope's or cardinals' cope? Source: "...fu concessa...ai caudatari di San Pietro, i sacerdoti che...reggevano la coda...del papa o dei cardinali" (Borgatti (1926), pp. 169-170)
    • ALT1:... that before being consecrated, the church of Santa Maria della Purità in Rome was a garbage dump? Source: "...che era divenuto...deposito d'immondizia d'ogni genere." (Borgatti (1926), p. 169))

Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   New enough, long enough. It's within policy but could do with some clean-up, it uses quite a lot of jargon (like "thaumaturgical") and other minor issues (e.g., "E-W direction" instead of "east-west direction"). However, it won't keep it from a DYK. The hooks are both good, hooky and interesting to a broad audience in my opinion, and supplied with citations. QPQ has not been done yet. There is no image. So, waiting for a QPQ but then basically good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •   Thanks for reviewing! QPQ and some copyediting done, links added to explain the jargon terms. Alex2006 (talk) 10:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •   Thank you for taking the time to address these questions. QPQ is now done, Italian-language sources AGF. The article is good to go for DYK. Yakikaki (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply