Talk:Sandbagging

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 38.104.218.242 in topic Social v Media
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Gym edit

  Resolved
 – No such entry in the page as of 2011.

Why would someone sandbag at the gym?

128.113.146.196 07:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redundant edit

  Resolved
 – See WP:DAB.

Why is this categorised as a disambiguation page? There's a true disambiguation page at "Sandbag (disambiguation)". This one is just a largely-redundant list of specific uses of one meaning of the term. Should it be recategorised or even deleted? 209.150.62.29 01:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's a disambiguation page because it disambiguates between articles, e.g. multiple articles on "sandbagging". See WP:DAB on how and why disambiguation pages are created. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 18:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

2007-12-26 Automated pywikipediabot message edit

  FYI
 – Automated notice.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 01:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bogus entries edit

Please do not add entries, like for bookkeeping or climbing, unless there is an article or article section to which to link. Any entries without this much encyclopedic content behind them (presumably including sources at the linked article) will be considered WP:NFT and WP:V violations and deleted. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 18:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Social v Media edit

I added a 'media' definition, but it might be better to fold the dead link to 'social' into it and create an actual article. I'm dubious that this is a common-usage term for social interactions, but there's definitely a technical term for news interviews cut/framed to attack the interviewee. Per the request for sources, http://www.polygon.com/2017/2/21/14683942/pewdiepie-controversy-youtube-drama can be seen using the term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.218.242 (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply