Talk:San Jacinto Fault Zone

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

San Diego Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:San Jacinto Fault Zone is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from San Jacinto Fault Zone appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 December 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Anza seismic gap on the San Jacinto Fault Zone has potential for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/San Jacinto Fault Zone.

Wikipedia

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a page for the San Jacinto Fault that was created following the creation of the page for the San Jacinto Fault Zone. The name of San Jacinto Fault is technically inaccurate; it is a series of faults rather than a single, continuous fault. Whocaresohio (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Borrego Springs quake

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It should remain as notable for the time being given the USGS summary indicating its relationship to the Calexico quake and a marked increase of activity progressing northward at the current time. Tmangray (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Another reason for inclusion is the release of stress on the fault, which, if it occurs periodically, may delay a subsequent powerful quake and make it less severe; a long period of no quakes is a warning sign, but a long string of minor quakes with monitored results become predictive. Dru of Id (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic