San Gioacchino ai Prati di Castello is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The title of this page is wrong. The name of the church is "San Gioacchino in Prati", but the cardinalate title is "San Gioacchino ai Prati di Castello". Don't assume that a cardinalate title is automatically the name of the church concerned! Several titular churches in Rome have titles which differ from their names, and this is causing quite a lot of confusion online. Even such high-profile cultural websites as "info.roma" are being caught out. If in doubt, consult the lists of churches on the Diocese of Rome website: http://www.vicariatusurbis.org/?page_id=192. Basilwatkinsosb (talk) 07:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply