Talk:San Gabriel River (California)

Comments

The Rio Hondo is more a distributary than a tributary. As the article mentions water can be made to flow from the San Gabriel River into the Rio Hondo, and did in the past naturally. In fact the Rio Hondo may be best described as an older abandoned channel of the San Gabriel River that still retained some flow from other sources. It is actually a tributary of the LA river, which it flows into near where it enters the ocean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.122.240 (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Blatant Promotion Against WP

The external link to an individual selling gems was removed per blatant promotion policy. Damotclese (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Yellow-legged frog

The cited source re yellow-legged frog in headwater of San Gabriel river is about the frogs in the Mojave River which is not part of the San Gabriel watershed. Source has been removed and section tagged. --Mike Cline (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Gabriel River (California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Unimpeded flow, in Geography and Characteristics

At first I thought the figures given for unimpeded runoff were preposterously large, until it occurred to me that they weren't necessarily giving the rate per second. From the context, I assume it was intended to mean the rate per year, but even then, I couldn't reconcile it with the 184 cu.ft/sec given in the Quick Facks table. I'd correct it myself, but I don't know which if any of the figures given is correct.Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 20:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)