Talk:San Clemente (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bkonrad in topic Lead

Requested move 16 January 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. B2C's stats are comprehensive and no one has rebutted them, only made vague assertions. Jenks24 (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply



San Clemente (disambiguation)San Clemente – I think that none is a primary topic Vivaelcelta {talk  · contributions} 03:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support or Oppose?

edit

Page view stats

edit

It's a shame that the nom and the supporters don't even bother to look at the evidence, much less collect it and publish it for others to consider. Here's a start. It's pretty overwhelming. Maybe I'm missing something, but if I am, someone supporting this proposal needs to find it.

--В²C 18:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lead

edit

@Bkonrad: Thanks for trying to keep things neat but don't overdo it. The page should lead with what this name means (Spanish/Italian for St Clement) and it has to give the context for the PRIMARYTOPIC. You can't cut it down to US city since there are other places in the US by the same name. The additional links are optional but standard and useful for WP:READERs. — LlywelynII 22:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's pretty obvious the name is St. Clement. I don't think that needs an additional link in the lead. I'm not sure why the fact that there are other places in the US with that name has any relevance on the lead. olderwiser 00:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply