Talk:San Antonio de los Baños

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

1911 text edit

Note that there was an article on this town at a similar name, which used 1911 Britannia sourced text. This diff is the last version of it before it was converted to a redirect here: [1]... Hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 21:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

  • I support this move. It seems to fit naming conventions better and there is no reason not to that I am aware of. ++Lar: t/c 21:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • i support this move in keeping with naming conventions.GypsieSoul420 (formerly gypsie) 12:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Result: Page moved. Eugène van der Pijll 21:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Antonio de los Baños. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply