Talk:Sami Abdul Aziz Salim Allaithy
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Terminology
editIn this edit Allaithy's status was changed from "innocent" to "no longer enemy combatant".
I disagree with this edit. I don't think it is wikipedia policy to collaborate with spin-doctors. The reason DoD spin-doctors chose that term for the men who the CSRTs determined had been innocent, after all, was for the "optics" if they sued for unlawful imprisonment. The term "nlec" implies, incorrectly, that they had once been enemies, and had had a change of heart.
Justice Robertson mocked the DoD's use of this deceptive phrase.
Since Allaithy was innocent, let's say he was innocent, and refrain from doing Karl Rove's dirty work.
Alternatively, we could add a paragraph, or more, whatever was needed, to explain the context of this controversial weasel phrase, and the criticism it has drawn.
Since Al Laithy is unquestionably innocent, I would prefer the simple approach of just saying he was innocent, and avoiding any mention of the deceptive phrase altogether.
Cheers! -- Geo Swan 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that the term NLEC is, perhaps deliberately, misleading. I almost changed it to "no longer [considered to be an] enemy combatant" to make its meaning clearer (which is why the link is a self-pipe) (one of the other Guantanamo articles does have a similar explanation). However I think we should report what the forum found, not our interpretation of it. If they had found he was a blue crosseyed duck we should report that. Further more, by saying he is "innocent", we imply that an "enemy combatant" is "guilty" - without saying of what in either case. The decision is actually one of jurisdiction, not innocence or guilt. I felt that the quote marks and the hyperlink draw attention to the fact that the jargon term needs context, however I have now added a parenthetical note, hope that clears it up. Rich Farmbrough, 18:58 8 February 2007 (GMT).
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Sami Abdul Aziz Salim Allaithy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313135951/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000300-000399.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000300-000399.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/US-releases-Guantanamo-files/2006/04/04/1143916500334.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120910134338/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/764/eg11.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/764/eg11.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/ISN_252-ISN_322.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/measurements/ISN_252-ISN_322.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)