Talk:Sam Kerr/GA2

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 07:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 


Observations edit

  • A well presented page on the sporting achievements of Samantha Kerr, if overlinked and at risk of significant Linkrot.
  • Consideration might be given to further development of Kerr's sporting achivements with a sensible number of links in each section.
  • The reality is that this sportswoman will remain in the public domain for the rest of her sporting career (possibly another 10 years, if not more). So the article may well attract further linkrot over time.
  • This is an article about the sporting history of Sam Kerr, not a statistician's history of her sporting career. A fine line has to be struck here with regard to her unfolding career.

Final edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
  •   Passed