Talk:Salzburg Conference/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 23:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   After some minor copyediting I made the article flow better for a layman, put spacing to make paragraphs, removed some unnecessary things, and added some important links. I can't see any spelling mistakes and I improved some of the word choices.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   This was actually an easy review to do, at least for the references, since I actually do own a lot of these books. The information is found in the references.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   This article covers the prelude to the foundation of the Slovak State, the previous partitions done at Vienna, the political situation in Slovakia, and the end result of the conference.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   There is no apologetics for the Nazis, the Nazi-sympathizers in Slovakia, nor is it biased in a Western view of the event.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Excluding my own edits the most recent edits to this page took place in late February and early March.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The images for this article are great, although there initially was an excess making the page look cluttered, but I only needed to remove one image and shift the placement of some.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Before I get into the end of the GA review I would like to thank you @Buidhe: all for of the work you have done on improving articles relating to Slovakia's actions during World War Two since it has always been interesting to me since I was in middle school along with the German annexation of Czechoslovak hence why I have these books about Slovakia. This article is greatly written with almost no grammatical or spelling mistakes, barring some that I could have missed, well-sourced, and I can't see anything preventing this article from reaching GA status. Since you already have over thirty GA articles under your belt and the simplicity of the article, as it is only a diplomatic meeting, I don't see a reason for another editor to go over this. - Jon698 talk 23:18 3 April 2020