Talk:Salton Sink

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Aramink in topic History

There is no vandalism intended or done by my previous edits and reverts to this article or "Category Southern Mojave". Removing and reverting mine is not consistent with "Northern Mojave - Mono" category which has consistently included a few select specific articles to assist non-hydrologists to locate the region and begin to understand it. I am the one originating the talk page here. Took "to heart" top banner on both categories to "help populate" them, and since appreciated their recent creation did many sincere Good Faith efforts to do so. Category originator needs to please stop name calling, and instead to communicate rationale for different approaches, Thank you.----Look2See1 t a l k → 19:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

syntax corrections--Look2See1 t a l k → 19:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Note; User:71.219.172.174 still refuses to discuss category questions here. User only reverts my good faith edits with presumptuous and incorrect language about my intention and does not 'assume good faith' - instead name-calling of vandalism. I claim good faith for both of us, in my reverts, & have no interest in "edit wars" - only in readers finding article that use geographical name rather than geographical-hydrological (Great Basin-Watershed) parent-grandparent category links. Have kindly asked User:71.219.172.174 to discuss, and also set up this page to do so, however they are unwilling to do so from first edit to present date.----Look2See1 t a l k → 00:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Salton Sink has more than one "family" here, like many modern entities, so another "Parent - Grandparent" category lineage is appropriate. It seems like domination vandalism to disown an "inlaw - partner" family lineage of Salton Sink, though editor's motivations unexplained by them. User:71.219.172.174 has been unable-unwilling to return positive understanding continuously extended and expressed to them.----Look2See1 t a l k → 00:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
NOTE; Comment on article's history/edit page, by 71.219.169.105, now & pasted here below by--Look2See1 t a l k → 23:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC):Reply
Salton Sink‎; 21:46 . . (-108) . . 71.219.169.105 (talk) (Removed PARENT category for Category:Geography of the Colorado Desert placed via vandalous edits (3) by User:Look2See1, who lied about discussion he has LOOKed & SEEn in edit summary!)
NOTE: That editor 71.219.169.105 continues to revert my edits without discussion here, and continues to presume and mis-assume my intentions in their comments misplaced on edit page "brief comment box" instead of here. Have concern that editor has "edit war &/or vandalism by "vandalism labeling others' non-vandalism reverts" tendencies now, or at least has a non-communication issue in order to dominate & 'own' an article? One cannot force another to discuss, so will continue to good faith revert category to include the additional 'Parent Category lineage' that 'needs inclusion & that 71.219.169.105 is not focused on/validating.----Look2See1 t a l k → 23:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected due to edit warring by anon with misleading and incivil edit summaries. Anon also added citation needed and other tags predated to June 09 and other tags referring to discussion page without discussing anything here. The anon is invited to discuss their concerns here. Vsmith (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article does need additional sources and to be better defined. What are the boundaries of the ill-defined geographic sink or depressed area. The tectonic Salton Trough (needs an article) is better defined and produced the topographically low area this article is struggling to define. Vsmith (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

History edit

The language of this section is poorly crafted. Is it trying to say that the Colorado river was diverted by canal to create two new rivers that dumped waters into the lowest lying area of the Salton Sink to recreate the Salton Sea? After several re-readings, I am still not sure what river is referred to. Aramink (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply