Disambiguation edit

This article is really still just a disambiguation page. Since the superior and inferior salivatory nucleus already have articles of their own, the top half needs attention from a medical expert to fill it out. It also needs more current references to verify that this page isn't just an historical oddity, that the information is still current. — Myk Streja [citation needed] 20:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Inferior salivatory nucleus edit

they are one of only two groups better presented on target page Iztwoz (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The original point of Salivatory nuclei was to be a disambiguation page. I personally am not comfortable with the changes that have been made here. I think it should be reverted back to >this page<. Any real improvements at this point would only duplicate efforts made to the subject of this message and Superior salivatory nucleus. Iztwoz What do you think? — Myk Streja [citation needed] 14:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello  — Myk Streja - it was a disambiguation page to deal with the two similarly named items. This simply doesn't need to be a disambiguation page - two items one superior one inferior. Making a stub instead of a dab page makes things easier for linking and so on. Cannot understand your viewpoint. Historical oddity!!?? Best --Iztwoz (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by merge. Do you mean for this page to go away? If someone were to search for "Salivatory nuclei" without this page, how would that help? What should replace it? — Myk Streja [citation needed] 18:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
The proposal means to merge the info from both pages to this the target page. This page name would remain and both types superior and inferior would link here. --Iztwoz (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Superior salivatory nucleus edit

they are one of only two groups that would be better presented on target page Iztwoz (talk) 08:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

See above. — Myk Streja [citation needed] 14:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Done