| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saflieni phase article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://users.aber.ac.uk/jpg/malta/arch.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
UNESCO source edit
This article relies to a single source, the UNESCO WHS, which does not even mention this phase. Better sourcing is needed. --Tone 09:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, Tone! I've added one ref, but more are needed. May I suggest changing the maintenance tag to "ref improve"? – there's nothing wrong with the facts (except their paucity), they are just poorly cited. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. If there are better sources demonstrating that this phase exist in the Maltese chronology, that's fine ;) --Tone 11:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)