Talk:Sad Lovers & Giants
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of the band edit
Just curious: Why is the band name spelled here with an ampersand when that's not the correct spelling per the records.
If you look at any of the covers, or their site itself, it is Sad Lovers and Giants, not Sad Lovers & Giants.
Greg Fasolino 16:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Melting itfot.jpeg edit
Image:Melting itfot.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Notable people edit
I happened to spot the reversion of this group from the notable people section of the article on Watford. They are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia article, so is their summary exclusion from the Watford article, without a proper reason being given, really justified? Two of their albums got 4.5 stars out of 5 from All Music reviewers , and they have made several albums. A case for a reconsideration? A P Monblat (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)