Talk:Sabbath Rest Advent Church
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
- This page should not be deleted because it is an important component in church history.
Ewroitsch (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC) ew
- This article will be improved within the next few days (references, etc.).
Rmorstadt (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- This article is not written from a neutral point of view. -- Ϫ 08:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Edits, March 2012 edit
PTtrans, the way I see it there are two sources which partly contradict each other, and for now I think they have to stand side by side. It is reasonable to assume, for instance, that the Handbuch is making a general statement about the church that they think applies broadly, whereas the statements in the Siegener Zeitung interview may be read as pertaining to Dickendorf. But such hypothesizing isn't really necessary, since I hope my phrasing indicates where the difference is. For now, there is little choice but to accept the authority of the Handbuch and to find, at the same time, a reasonable place for the comments by Dura himself. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.135.242 (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_avventista_del_riposo_sabatico — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.57.153 (talk) 21:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Article does not meet quality or neutrality standards. edit
This article is biased, poorly written and repeats the same content several times. Making a recommendation to rewrite. Nanoic (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)