This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Removed from article:
The START II Treaty was never ratified by the USA, and Russia withdrawed from it on on June 13, 2002, as the United States withdrew from the ABM Treaty.[1]
Above "wrong" statement could be misleading, in that most people interpret "ratification" as entry into force, or activation. There's a difference. While ratified, the START II treaty was never entered into force. Later, one day after the U.S. withdrew from the ABM treaty, Russia withdrew from the START II treaty on June 14, 2002:
"The START II Treaty did not enter into force because the Russian ratification act made entry into force conditional on U.S. Senate consent to ratification of the September 1997 protocol and approval of the Agreed Statements on ABM-TMD Demarcation. Neither of these occurred because of opposition to the latter in the U.S. Senate, where a strong faction objected to any action that might be seen as supporting the ABM Treaty. On June 14, 2002, one day after the U.S. withdrew from the ABM Treaty, Russia announced that it would no longer consider itself to be bound by START II provisions."[2]
Based on the above I'm restoring a modified version of the removed statement which clarifies the START II treaty was never in force. I'm sure that was the intent of the original statement, although technically the treaty was ratified. Joema15:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Why does "the same argument applies to new American SLBMs"? If you can't destroy an opponent's missiles with your own (because they're in submarines) then what advantage does anyone get by launching first? Ojw (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply