Talk:SS Pere Marquette/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Shall be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead edit

  • "and provided service between the ports of Ludington, Michigan, and Manitowoc, Wisconsin," - provided a service or provided services

Railroad car ferry edit

  • Wikilinked Milwaukee
  • "and had two twelve foot propellers" - please use the convert template on the text highlighted in bold
  • "had a displacement of some 4,050 tons" - same query as above
  • "propellers for its driving force." - to drive it or a phrase along those lines
  • Wikilink compound engine
  Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "that produced 2,500 horsepower." - same query as above
  • "It was unique in that it" - The steamship
  • Wikilink Lake Michigan
  • "on February 17, 1897." - the year doesn't need to be mentioned; can be either February 17 or the following day or the next day
  • "On February 21, 1897," - same issue as above
  • Any information on when the vessel was retired and/or broken up?
  Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Reference 5 is lacking the page number
  • Reference 8 looks to be missing the page number

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Doug Coldwell: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply