Talk:SS El Oriente/GA1

GA Review

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • The last three paragraphs of the "World War I" section are fairly short. Can they be combined in any way?
     • How does it look now?
   • In the lead, you say the ship was built in 1910 twice.
     • I removed the second one.
   • In the "World War II" section, third paragraph, you say "often by performed by Soviet women and political prisoners". Should the first "by" be removed?
     • Yes it should :) , and now is removed.
   • In the "Red Cross ship" section, you have a set of refs out of numerical order.
     • Good catch. I think that was an artifact of the Did You Know? process.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • In the "World War I" section, fourth paragraph, the last sentence needs a ref
     • Added.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another nice article. I'm putting it on hold to allow time to address the few concerns I detailed above. Dana boomer (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Replies above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good - I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)