Talk:SS Batavier V (1902)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by DSachan in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Below is the review of my article:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Lead says upto 300 passengers could be carried. The main text raises this number to 428. Please remove the discrepancy. Same issue as in SS Batavier II (1897).
    I have put the exact number in the lead. I think it is better without taking any toll on lead. - DSachan (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Thanks - DSachan (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply