 | SR U class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review edit
My checklist:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
A few comments before I feel like I should pass this.
- See WP:UNITS - a non-breaking space should be added between values and units (i.e. add a between 2 and kg for 2 kg).
- What does "mogul" mean in this context?
- Spelling mistakes - I've corrected all I found, but please spell check in future before nominating.
- Date or page ranges need to be delineated with en-dash (see WP:DASH).
I don't quite see what the problem is concerning delineation, unless you have already corrected this.--Bulleid Pacific 22:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Please attend to these and I'll move the article from being on hold to pass. The Rambling Man 17:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, still a few MOS issues which I've now resolved myself (e.g. en-dashes, etc) so I'll move this to GA now. The Rambling Man 17:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)