Talk:SM UB-42/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Wandalstouring in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • References needed:
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comment: Take a look at cref. It's easier to maintain. Wandalstouring (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply