Talk:SMS Württemberg (1878)/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
I'll take on this review. (I'm on a roll!) --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Criterion 1
editLead
edit- "Her sisterships were" - Her sister ships were
- Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Service history
edit- As with the other reviews, should I Division and II DIvision be wikilinked?
- Can you wikilink "F-boats"?
- The lead says that the Württemberg was modernized in Kiel, but the service history section says that she was modernized in Danzig.
- Should be Kiel - was probably looking Bayern's entry. As for F-boats, they're a type of minesweeper, but we don't have an article on them yet. A red link won't hurt though. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Criterion 2
editI'm accepting these refs in good faith, as all of these references are offline. The article is well-referenced, however, and has inline citations and a dedicated ref section.
Criterion 3
editThe article is broad with regard to its contemporary warship articles and is well-focused too.
Criterion 4
editThere isn't really a place where the article is not neutral.
Criterion 5
editEdit history tells me that this article is stable indeed.
Criterion 6
editBoth images are documented and valid in terms of copyright status.
Overall comments
editKeep it up! As always, a few issues with prose and wikilinks, but nothing much else. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:45, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Should all be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Looks good. I'm passing the article now. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 16:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)