Talk:SMS Victoria/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


This article is in fine shape. A few comments from me:

  • the is a duplicate link of Prussian navy in the lead
    • I thought I fixed that, but apparently not...
  • the engine didn't drive the boilers, but that's the way it reads
    • Fixed - I had meant to go through these and fix that after your raised that point in the other review you did, but I got sidetracked - maybe 2nd reminder is the charm?
  • suggest swapping the link to keel to a link for keel laying, as it is more germane
    • Added it to "laid down" instead, so both links are available
  • link ship commissioning
    • Done
  • move link to Kiel up to first mention
    • Done
  • what calibre etc were the rifled guns she got in 1867?
    • Clarified
  • suggest "thea shipment"
    • Good idea
  • suggest "Victoria carried a business representative for what was now the North German Confederation from Havana to La Guaira, Venezuela."
    • I wasn't entirely happy with how that sentence came out - I like your solution better.
  • possibly work in a link to the Ten Years' War when talking about the unrest in Cuba?
    • Ah, I didn't know there was an article for that.
  • suggest "crewmen who had been seriously injured in a severe storm had to be sent ashore to a military hospital."
    • That works better
  • during her 1871 shipyard visit, did the built-up guns replace the rifled guns or the original smoothbore ones? It is getting a bit confusing...
    • Clarified, and I added some of these details to the design section, so hopefully that should make it clearer.
  • Salvador or El Salvador?
    • Good catch - sometimes I get the
  • link Liberia
    • Done
  • image licensing looks fine

That's me done. Great work! Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks PM! Parsecboy (talk) 12:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
No worries. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply