Talk:SMS Triglav (1913)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Triglav/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

I'll do the batch. Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

• Link Pelagosa
• Did she not participate in the attack on Italy in May 1915? If not, do you know why not? Parsecboy (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Not covered in my sources; we'd need those German-language books on A-H destroyers and torpedo boats to get an answer, I think.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
    • I had a look in Bilzer (see the ref in SMS Tiger (1887) for instance) and he says Triglav was guarding Sebenico during the attack. I can send you scans of the pages on the Tatras if you want - there are probably other details of her (and the other ships') activities not covered in the article. Parsecboy (talk) 10:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
      • That would be great.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
        • You've got mail! Parsecboy (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
          • You sure? It looks to me like she's in Sebenico until 10 April and is then pulling security for the Ancona bombardment on 23/24 May, whatever exactly that means?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
            • Ha, yeah, you're right - I misread it. That'll teach me to just glance at something ;) Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

You have any better idea of what Bilzer actually means by "Sicherung vor Ancona" on 23/24 May?

No, I'd interpret that as screening for the fleet. Parsecboy (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

OK, I've added all relevant stuff from Bilzer.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

I probably wouldn't have put a header there, since only one of the three paragraphs is about the bombardment, but I won't let that hold up promotion. Nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)