Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1912)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by NerdyScienceDude in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Looks good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
    Fixed. Added some Conway's and Sokol's.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    No problems here.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Looks neutral to me.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No edit wars detected.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images look good and illustrate the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Looks good, but I have one comment pointed out above. I will pass it once the comment has been responded to. ~NerdyScienceDude 23:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

It looks good, so I'll pass it. Congratulations! ~NerdyScienceDude 23:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply