Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dank in topic GA Review
Good articleSMS Meteor (1890) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Meteor (1890) is part of the Avisos of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 17:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review

  • "an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": no comma
  • " Her keel was laid in 1888, she was launched in January 1890, and completed in May 1891.": nonparallel; one fix is to replace the first comma by a semicolon
  • "She served in this capacity through World War I and after the German defeat, was sold for scrapping in 1919.": A little better would be: She served in this capacity through World War I. After the German defeat, the ship was sold for scrapping in 1919.
  • "p. 814": de-italicize
  • Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    - Dank (push to talk) 18:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Can you tell I copied that first line in all of the articles of this series when I created the stubs? Everything should be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passed - Dank (push to talk) 19:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply