Talk:SMS Kaiser Barbarossa/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

Looks good so far, some minor points though:

• There are no citation errors and external links check out (no action required),
• One dab link (to Schichau) which needs to rectified; and  Done
• The prose is a little wooden in places but this won't hold it back in my opinion.

More to follow. Anotherclown (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Overall, another good article IMO. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article, Anotherclown. Parsecboy (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Anotherclown (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)