Talk:SMS Königsberg (1915)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Link to 88mm flak gun article, sister/sister ship. Mines is duplicated.
- Links added - as far as I can tell, naval mine is only linked once. Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, my fault; I should have said that mines appear twice in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- No worries, fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, my fault; I should have said that mines appear twice in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Links added - as far as I can tell, naval mine is only linked once. Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Link to 88mm flak gun article, sister/sister ship. Mines is duplicated.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Is a picture available?
- Added a photo of Karlsruhe
- Is a picture available?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: