Talk:SMS Baden (1880)/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 04:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll take on this review. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 04:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

You referred to the Baden as the Württemberg once here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starstriker7's Sidekick
Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Dürr boilers" - Can you wikilink this?
Can you wikilink "armored citadel"?
- Unfortunately, there don't appear to be any articles that would be good links. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decapitalize "History" in the section title.
Can you wikilink "I Division" and "II Division" like in the other articles.
"which displaced Württemberg and her three sisters to the II Division." - Wouldn't it make more sense to exchange Württemberg with Baden?
- Fixed the first and third, as for the links, I'm not entirely sure what the best course of action is. The article will probably end up at I Battle Squadron with section headers for the I and II Divisions, but I'd rather hold off adding links until I actually write the article and set up the section headers. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  - Yeah, I see what you mean. That does make the most sense. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 00:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article is thoroughly referenced with offline book references. Inline citations and separate reference sections are used. All clear here.

The article has no obvious gaps, and is sufficiently focused.

The article's tone is neutral.

The article's revision history suggests that the article is stable.

Both articles' images check out.

Keep 'em coming. You are doing a great job. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 04:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks good. I'll pass this article momentarily. --Starstriker7 - public^(talk) 00:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply