Talk:SKYbrary

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 2 September 2008, see discussion.
delete, 13 August 2008, see discussion.

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Websites: Computing

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I'm not done yet, just started rewriting Knowledge Hunter (talk) 08:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AFD edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKYbrary. If you're recreating the article make sure to adress the concerns raised. --Aktsu ^(t / c) 08:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes we will Knowledge Hunter (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed the G11 SD as I feel it's no longer valid now :) Still, the article currently contains copyrighted text from About Skybrary, and you might want to do something about that as I couldn't find anything about SKYbrary licensing the text under GFDL or a similar licence. Good luck with the article! --Aktsu ^(t / c) 08:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The paragraph could be rephrased, but doesn't really contain any specifics or definitions, it just states the launch of skybrary, as mentioned on quite some aviation safety authorative websites. Should I still bother, or not? Cheers Knowledge Hunter (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it's still a copyright violation. I took care of it and fixed up the article a little now though. I'm not to familiar with it though so I might have made some mistakes. --Aktsu ^(t / c) 10:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I took care of some inline citations that were lacking and cleaned up a bit more. Thank you for your support. Knowledge Hunter (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic