Talk:SC-76 Thunderbolt
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Rezin in topic Lack of sources = lack of notability
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2020. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SC-76 Thunderbolt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Lack of sources = lack of notability edit
I searched Google to try to find more sources for this rifle, but came up empty. That's why I tagged it for notability. If our only source is the company itself, then this rifle probably isn't worth having an article about. There ought to be several independent sources available in order to write an NPOV article. See WP:Notability. Unfortunately, I don't see any suitable merge topic either, since the company isn't apparently notable either. Rezin (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)