Talk:SAS President Kruger/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

• Section 1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and links in right place.
• Section 2; para 1; Remove the dup-link of "Royal Navy"
• Section 2; para 1; Link "President of South Africa"
• Section 2; para 1; Is the name of wife of the Navy Chief of Staff, Rear-Admiral Hugo Biermann, available?

• Section 2; para 1; "with Captain M.R. Terry-Lloyd was in command" -> "with Captain M.R. Terry-Lloyd in command"
• Section 2; para 2; Link "Argentina"
• Section 2; para 3; Why is "Dreadnought" mentioned in italics?
  • All ship names are italicized.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
• Section 2; para 3; Remove the dup-link of "Canary Islands"
• Section 2; para 3; "New York City" was linked twice in the para.
• Section 2; para 3; Remove the dup-link of "corvettes"
• Section 2; para 3; Change 1979–80 to 1979–1980 per MOS:DATERANGE
• Section 2.2.1; What is "PWO"? Never defined in the previous para
• External link check shows one dead link (saafmuseum.org.za).
  • Deleted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: Any update on this? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the lengthy delay. All done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)